Live Business Chat
2013 May 20, 10:34:01 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Some accounts got accidentally deleted by anti-spam software during a spammer attack on this forum. Please re-register. If you have trouble, contact badon or tamo42 in the chat. This is a friendly non-profit discussion group about making money. You won't be able to see all forums at first. You have to register to see more forums. Click the "NOTIFY" button every chance you get to receive instant alerts about new information.
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 »  All   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Release note of v1.1.9 tree  (Read 6949 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
persicum
Serious Business
***

Karma: +2/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 122


« Reply #10 on: 2011 Aug 20, 02:36:12 am »

badon, what movie quality do you prefer?
1) 720p
2) 1080p24
3) Disk remux
4) BD original?

Are you really going to watch them again and again to protect them?
Logged
badon
Administrator
Capitalist Pig
*****

Karma: +55/-38
Offline Offline

Posts: 6616



« Reply #11 on: 2011 Aug 20, 06:04:58 pm »

Protect them? From what? I think I'm OK with 720p movie quality. Better quality requires hardware that isn't ubiquitous yet.

What's "disk remux"?
Logged

Do not PM questions. Answers should be publicly available.
Backup is not enough. Protect your data with MultiPar.
Writer of LBC Chinese coin investment articles.
Founder of the Coin Compendium (forum).
I type faster on a TypeMatrix.
Use my work. Give credit.
persicum
Serious Business
***

Karma: +2/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 122


« Reply #12 on: 2011 Aug 20, 09:56:51 pm »

Disk remux is a BR-disk with untought video track and an only few audio tracks to fit single sided BD-rewritable, whereas 1080 mkv quality has noticably recompressed video track and 720p quality has downscaled video track.

The problem is should we delete a movie after watching it or should we protect it with reedsolomon codes for longterm storage?
Logged
badon
Administrator
Capitalist Pig
*****

Karma: +55/-38
Offline Offline

Posts: 6616



« Reply #13 on: 2011 Aug 20, 10:41:57 pm »

Oh, you're asking me about applications for MultiPar on video storage? That is one thing I use it for. I've noticed that videos stored a long time are very susceptible to corruption. Most people don't notice data corruption because they don't have any data that is both large, and easy for them to thoroughly examine. Video files are large, and easy to examine. You just watch the video, and if you see or something funny in it, you just found data corruption!

Since data corruption happens continuously, but infrequently, you have to examine a lot of data before you get a chance to see it. It's sort of like watching meteors at night. Even though there are thousands of them streaking across the sky every day, it is unlikely that you will be looking at the right place at the right time when one happens to fly by. So, you get comfortable, and you wait...

With videos, it's like looking at the whole sky all at once, instead of just a small part of it.
Logged

Do not PM questions. Answers should be publicly available.
Backup is not enough. Protect your data with MultiPar.
Writer of LBC Chinese coin investment articles.
Founder of the Coin Compendium (forum).
I type faster on a TypeMatrix.
Use my work. Give credit.
Yutaka Sawada
Moderator
Mogul
*****

Karma: +8/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 311


« Reply #14 on: 2011 Sep 16, 05:43:43 pm »

[ Change of searching files ]

 In previous versions, other splited or similar named files are not searched, when there is a damaged file.

Example filenames;
Original file: something.txt
Splited files: something.txt.001, something.txt.002, something.txt.003
Similar named files: something.temp.txt, something.txt.1

 Thus, if a user wanted to get more blocks, he needed to rename the original filename to another like "something.txt.2". Because this action is annoying and most users may not know the usage, it was changed at detailed verification. When there are some similar named files, the verification becomes slow. If a user know that his files are not so damaged, simple verification is faster (but may find less available blocks).


[ Option window is renewed ]

 From this version, Option window consists of 4 pages. The text and categoly may be changed still, when there is more good word. If you think that a translated description text is strange, please notice me. Because the GUI's Dialog Font is different in varied OSes and languages, some problem are possible for long text or small box. For example, Russian characters are double wider on my PC... If a text is not shown fully on your PC, let me know the OS, language, and which part. Screen-shot of the dialog will help to see the problem, too.


[ The mechanism of auto-repair is changed ]

 When "Monitor files to verify" is checked on Option window, it will monitor the change/add of both recovery files and source files. If "Repair automatically" is checked also in same time, it will repair source files, when there becomes enough blocks. If "Repair automatically" isn't checked, it will just do verify only, and a user needs to click "Repair" buttom manually.

 Even when "Monitor files to verify" isn't checked on Option window, it will re-verify by adding external files manually. If "Repair automatically" is checked at this time, it will repair instead of verify only.

 As a simple conculusion, if you don't want (or are lazy) to click "Repair" button, use "Repair automatically" option.


[ Changes from 1.1.9.2 to 1.1.9.3 ]

* GUI update
 Numbers of available blocks in found splited files are not added into the original file.
 Partially repaired files are sent to Recycle Bin by setting both "Delete damaged files after Repair" and "Send files to Recycle Bin".
 Right-click menu over file-list is shown at non-English language GUI.
 "Add Files" button/menu on Create window works correctly for multiple selected files.
 Option window is newly constructed by property-sheet pages.
 Monitor feature (re-verify again) becomes disabled, when a user canceled the current verification.
 While the monitor feature is in active, status text is shown on right of "Time left".
 Auto-Repair is enabled for Monitor or adding external files manually.
 Graph of verification result has gradations and is shown properly on all Windows OS.

* Client update
 Even when a damaged file exists, other splited or similar named files will be searched for more available blocks at detailed verification.
 PAR3's partially repaired files are saved as "filename.incomplete.extension" at incomplete recovery.
 "/br" option is added to send backup file into recycle bin.
 Incomplete recovery becomes to work well with splited files.



[ Hash value ]

MultiPar1193.7z
MD5 : 981C6E6F9C6C9FCF963E81761AADD9EC
SHA-1 : 2A46B702BF3F8D0C6F1CD2EC1F0859F136CFB336

MultiPar1193_setup.exe
MD5 : 3F1D5580A3E65DF83ED2844B724FA345
SHA-1 : 2C887D035B628E6E23DE111A02E10ABDE7F34CCE

* MultiPar1193.7z (309.81 KB - downloaded 304 times.)
* MultiPar1193_setup.exe (829.99 KB - downloaded 553 times.)
Logged
BobFX
Planner
*

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 11


« Reply #15 on: 2011 Sep 18, 08:52:12 pm »

A couple of remarks about this release:

- "About" does not display the version number in this release.

- I installed it on 2 PC, both running Windows 7 SP 1 x64. On the first, it works fine, but on the second, when selecting several files and trying to create PAR files by right-clicking on them (Shell integration), MultiPAR does not start.

I have no idea why it works on one PC, and not on the other.

Clicking on a PAR file to repair does work on both PCs though.
Logged
Yutaka Sawada
Moderator
Mogul
*****

Karma: +8/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 311


« Reply #16 on: 2011 Sep 19, 09:29:28 pm »

I found that I did mistake in v1.1.9.3's GUI. Drag & Drop files over List-box or Edit-box on Create window happened to be disabled. Version number on About window happened to be erased. These are fixed at next version.

from BobFX
Quote
I have no idea why it works on one PC, and not on the other.

I need more information, too. Is the check-box on Option window checked ? Is the righ-click menu itself shown ? How are the registory entries ? Is the path of MultiPar correct/unchanged ?
Logged
BobFX
Planner
*

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 11


« Reply #17 on: 2011 Sep 19, 11:06:05 pm »

I need more information, too. Is the check-box on Option window checked ?

Yes.

Quote
Is the righ-click menu itself shown ?

Yes.


Quote
How are the registory entries ?

I found MultiPar only in one set of keys, see attached file.


Quote
Is the path of MultiPar correct/unchanged ?

Yes:

C:\Program Files (x86)\MultiPar\


* Multi.gif (26.05 KB, 1116x417 - viewed 75 times.)
Logged
Urgehal
Doer
*

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 25


« Reply #18 on: 2011 Sep 20, 12:50:50 pm »

Great! Thank you Yutaka for the new version *thumbs up* ;)
Logged
Yutaka Sawada
Moderator
Mogul
*****

Karma: +8/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 311


« Reply #19 on: 2011 Sep 21, 08:39:56 pm »

from BobFX
Quote
when selecting several files and trying to create PAR files by right-clicking on them (Shell integration), MultiPAR does not start.

1) problem in installation ?

Because the right-click menu is shown and the check-box is checked, Shell Extension might be installed correctly. By the way, if you have been used old version 1.1.8 DLL ago, you needed to un-install it at first.

For example, you should check a registry entry in HKLM;
"HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Classes\CLSID\{333EFDA5-A74E-4df4-A225-92A7AF81F29A}"
This may conflict with the new entry in HKCU.

Also, I want to check is the path of "MultiParShlExt64.dll" and "MultiPar.exe". They need to be put in a same folder. You check the path of them.

You check the registry entry in;
"HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Classes\CLSID\{333EFDA5-A74E-4df4-A225-92A7AF81F29A}\InprocServer32"
If it isn't "C:\Program Files (x86)\MultiPar\MultiParShlExt64.dll", something is wrong.

When you target one recovery file and right-click it, select "MultiPar - Verify Recovery Volume". Does MultiPar GUI open ? If it opens GUI, there is problem in a code of invoke creation.


2) problem in running ?

If you try to create recovery files for source files with very long path, it fails. Simply MultiPar does not support 256 or longer path. Those files will be ignored. How is the filenames and the number of files ?

When you specify 62 or more source files, DLL will make file-list in the user's application data path. If so, you search "MultiPar_list.tmp" in your PC, too. Basically, the path is the parent of "save" folder.
Logged
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 »  All   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.06 seconds with 18 queries.